Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Edward J.
dc.contributor.authorVolkmann, W. M.
dc.contributor.authorBongi, Silvio
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-11T14:05:56Z
dc.date.available2018-10-11T14:05:56Z
dc.date.issued1988/07
dc.identifier1689
dc.identifier.govdocSM-211
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12489/178
dc.description.abstractA comparative study is made of the performance of four different estimators as used in the matched field technique of passive localization. The study is based on both real and synthesized data. In the synthesized data case, a comparison is made of the performance of the estimators for various signal-to-noise ratios. The four estimators studied are Bucker's Estimators, which can be thought of as a
dc.description.abstractspatial matched filter, and three likelihood-type estimators. The results indicate that the matched-field type estimator has a slightly better signal-to-noise performance than the others, but rather poor sidelobe behaviour, whereas for the likelihood-type estimator the sidelobe behaviour is quite good.
dc.format16 p. : ill. ; 16 fig.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherNATO. SACLANTCEN
dc.relation.ispartofseriesADA199702
dc.subjectInverse problems
dc.subjectSignal processing
dc.subjectTarget localization
dc.subjectPassive sonar
dc.titleEstimators for model-based passive localization
dc.typeScientific Memorandum (SM)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record